Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Sebagaimana Diatur dan Diancam Pidana Dalam Pasal 351 ayat 1 KUHP (Studi Putusan PN Medan Nomor 1621/Pid.B/2023/PN Mdn

Authors

  • Laurenty Simanjuntak Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Richie Nicodemus Munthe Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Angelina Putri Gwen Sihotang Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Dewi Pika Lumban Batu Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58684/jarvic.v2i4.96

Keywords:

Criminal Offenses, Persecution, Criminal Code

Abstract

One of the  most common crimes in society is child abuse. Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Penal Code (KUHP) regulates and threatens criminal offenses in Indonesian criminal law. Medan District Court Decision No. 1621/Pid.B/2023/PN Mdn, regarding criminal abuses, will be discussed in this article. This study analyzes events and court decisions. Research methods include analysis of court decisions and legal analysis of criminal behavior. Research results show that, according to the provisions of the Penal Code,  abuse crimes can be classified into many types, including general abuse, mild abuse, intentional abuse and severe abuse. Important. Preventive and repressive measures are necessary to combat criminal acts. Criminal law is used to solve problems in society, while non-criminal methods focus on prevention. To bring justice to victims and all parties involved, law enforcement must understand the behavioral factors associated with criminal abuse.

 

References

Busyro, M. (2022) ‘Putusan Pengadilan Tentang Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Di Pengadilan Negeri PadangSidimpuan’, 9(7), pp. 3381–3386.

Hasdiwanti and Radjab, S. (2022) ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (studi Putusan Nomor 34/Pid.B/2019/PN Snj)’, Alauddin Law Development Journal, 4(3), pp. 655–672. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v4i3.19781.

Iskandar, A.S., Rahman, M.S. and Darwis, M. (2023) ‘Studi Kasus Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Terhadap Saksi Korban’, 10(1), pp. 109–114.

Kartono, M. (2020) ‘PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN LUKA BERAT (Analisis Putusan Perkara No : 10/Pid.B/2018/PN Rkb)’, Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), p. 654. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v2i2.4423.

Margono, P. (2016) ‘Tindakan Penganiayaan Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan’, Jurnal Independent, 4(2), p. 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v4i2.56.

Putra, A.P. (2023) ‘PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN LUKA ( PN BREBES ) Criminal Sanctions for Criminal Abuse that Caused’, 5(2), pp. 432–442.

Putusan, D. et al. (2023) ‘Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia’.

Tompodung, H.R.R. (2021) ‘Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian’, Lex Crimen, X(4), pp. 1–9. Available at: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33400/31603.

Zilvia, R. and Haryadi, H. (2021) ‘Disparitas Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Kasus Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan’, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), pp. 96–109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8271.

Zulfikar, A. (2023) ‘Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan oleh Anak di Bawah Umur Yang Dilakukan Oleh Lebih Dari Satu Orang Anak Mengakibatkan Kematian Korban’, Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 15(1), p. 132. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v15i1.439.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-11

How to Cite

Laurenty Simanjuntak, Richie Nicodemus Munthe, Angelina Putri Gwen Sihotang, Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan, & Dewi Pika Lumban Batu. (2023). Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Sebagaimana Diatur dan Diancam Pidana Dalam Pasal 351 ayat 1 KUHP (Studi Putusan PN Medan Nomor 1621/Pid.B/2023/PN Mdn. Journal of Research and Development on Public Policy, 2(4), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.58684/jarvic.v2i4.96